South West Bikers | Motorcycle Forum

1154macaw wrote:

speedy(delboy) wrote:

sonic_gsxr wrote:328 - the number of members posting less than 10 messages.

One of these is my udder arf who's just joined

Speedy how come your signature hasn't been removed because it's to big

good question keith

the reply may be interesting

I haven't got round to re-sizing his image yet. You can see that ages' has been done though

1blue wrote:

1154macaw wrote:

speedy(delboy) wrote: One of these is my udder arf who's just joined

Speedy how come your signature hasn't been removed because it's to big

good question keith

the reply may be interesting

IT HAS

Dave wrote:I haven't got round to re-sizing his image yet. You can see that ages' has been done though

so AGE gets his resized, is that because I mentioned it in the PM you didn't even reply to?

all the others just removed without warning.

and your avatar is offensive.

1blue wrote:

Dave wrote:I haven't got round to re-sizing his image yet. You can see that ages' has been done though

so AGE gets his resized, is that because I mentioned it in the PM you didn't even reply to?

all the others just removed without warning.

and your avatar is offensive.

wonder how long my membership will last now?

1blue wrote:wonder how long my membership will last now?

You are a twat, but I'm not gonna kick you because of it

Dave wrote:

1blue wrote:wonder how long my membership will last now?

You are a [Censored], but I'm not gonna kick you because of it

so if your being reasonable now.

1) why did you give no warning
2) why did you not reply to my PM
3) why do you still have an offensive avatar.

1blue wrote:

Dave wrote:

1blue wrote:wonder how long my membership will last now?

You are a [Censored], but I'm not gonna kick you because of it

so if your being reasonable now.

1) why did you give no warning
2) why did you not reply to my PM
3) why do you still have an offensive avatar.

hear, hear

I find your avatar offensive Dave

I never had a sig in the first place but i'll join in anyway.. damn you for taking it Dave.

seeing as it's dave's site it's up to him what rules he makes and when ... and i see nothing wrong with what he's doing, some sigs and avatars were OTT

Jak wrote:seeing as it's dave's site it's up to him what rules he makes and when ... and i see nothing wrong with what he's doing, some sigs and avatars were OTT

we pay money to be menbers. I think we can expect reasonable behavior in exchange.

would some warning have been so bad? or consultation?

But people have paid to use this site and you can not then take something off them without telling them

i'm going to echo what jak said, dave DOES NOT run this site at a profit and at least he is allowing us to still have sig, just within the certain parameters that I feel are very reasonable.