Page 3 of 3

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 10:32
by Chewie
Well that was the look i was going for Princess..

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 10:38
by Jewell
well it worked then you little fag.

Image

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 10:42
by Jewell
also....
Image

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 10:45
by baskie
lol

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 10:47
by Chewie
That's brilliant.. and to think.. all those pictures were designed to be used against people like you Princess...

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 10:49
by baskie
Chewie wrote:That's brilliant.. and to think.. all those pictures were designed to be used against people like you Princess...

:? :roll:

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 11:21
by watters
baskie wrote:
Jon B wrote:The reason there is no insurance is because Baskie doesn't have a licence.
i had a lisence to drive it and insurance but was only 3rd party. cant claim on his insurance becuase he wasnt insured on it anymore. and yes jon B and chewie i did have a lisence. so there we go boys

doesnt the owner of the bike have to be insured on it so that your 3rd party insurance can ride it?

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 11:27
by Jon B
Yeah that's right Watters.

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 11:44
by Jewell
Chewie wrote:That's brilliant.. and to think.. all those pictures were designed to be used against people like you Princess...
good comeback :roll:

Posted: Jul 28th, '06, 12:30
by baskie
watters wrote:
baskie wrote:
Jon B wrote:The reason there is no insurance is because Baskie doesn't have a licence.
i had a lisence to drive it and insurance but was only 3rd party. cant claim on his insurance becuase he wasnt insured on it anymore. and yes jon B and chewie i did have a lisence. so there we go boys

doesnt the owner of the bike have to be insured on it so that your 3rd party insurance can ride it?

no, only stipulation is aslong as my lisence entitled me to ride it, and that i dont own the bike. thats what my policy says anyways