I'm absolutely loving life on my '03 SV650S, but I'm starting to hanker after some more top-end grunt. High speed overtakes are noticably more hesitant than my buddies on 600-1000cc in-line 4's. One chap at work has a 1050 Speed Triple which is particularly impressive! Watching him rolling on from 80-90 leaves me feeling like I've stalled or something...
So I've been thinking about moving up to something of a larger capacity. After all, 'there's no replacement for displacement'! However, one big limiting factor in my choice of machine is the fact that I epitomise the term 'all-round-biker'. I use my bike to commute in all weathers, for a spot of touring both on my own and 2up with the missus, and for Sunday morning blasts with mates. So, it has to do all that and be bombproof enough to stand up to winter rain and salt. Italian exotica are out...!
I'm tempted by a KTM SuperDuke. The prospect of a litre V-Twin is appealing and KTM's off-road heritage seems to suggest that the thing won't rot over winter. But how would I get on unfaired?
One all-rounder seems so popular that Googling 'all-rounder bike' would throw up nothing but the VFR800. The V-TEC's get slated a lot, but I like the look of the VFR and on paper at least it sounds like just the ticket for me. But is it any good?
I like the look of the new Tiger 1050. It does seem a bit too 'off-roady', but reviews rave about it's sportsbike-like capabilities...
Or do I just say "bugger-it" to all of this all-rounder nonsense and get an R1 or GSX-R750/1000. Out-and-out sportsbikes they may be, but are they just so robust that I couldn't go wrong? Plenty of people tour on machines like that!
Or, do I just stick with the SV. After all, with the exception of the 'ultimate oompf', it's doing all I ask of it perfectly. The handling is sublime! Is it worth changing just to get some more wallop?! Particularly at the potential expense of handling?
Oh, I just dont know.
