Ok, I'v kept quite to see what the responses were and here are some replies:
At the same time, people should think about what they write sometimes - it can be very hard to read sarcasm/inflection/humour in a comment when typed that is all too obvious when said face to face ...... and that is even more true if you have never met the person/people making the comment
Absolutely 100% True.
I am sure he is a lovely gentleman in real life but having read some of his posts, he does come across as a bit of a c0ck. It seems like he is the one who cannot accept someone else has an opinion that differs from himself... but I guess we're all dangerous sports bike bikers whereas he is a true biker.
I guess our club hasn't lost out much.
It was replies like this that got his back up in the first place. I wounder why, all he was being called was things like cock and knobber etc etc
Did you actually read the whole thread Phil? Just because he's a mate and new to the site doesn't give him the right to disregard others views, chuck his weight around and expect everyone to swallow what he said without question. Whilst some mild abuse was directed in his direction, he wasn't hesitant in dishing it out:
Yes mate I read it all, and he only came back at people when they abused him as far as I could see.
Banter on here is the norm and once people get to know each other
Totally agree, I am the worst offender for this (apart from Spunky), but no one knew him.
I'd like to re-iterate that i would not like to see a dictatorship here in the uk. But i do object to mis-informed bullshit being aired.
I do believe he apologised to GSXRSi for having the Syke and helmet part wrong. He was mis-informed himself, geniun mistake.
Phil, I think you are seriously out of order having a go at everyone who commented on the first thread just because your friend is 'upset'
I dont think so, I know alot off people have different opionions, but, how many has been sent away from the site for being strong minded, to many.
The overall impression I got from the thread - and now backed up by your post - is that he is allowed to disagree with everyone else, but no-one is allowed to disagree with him. And on that - I refer you to your thread about this being a FORUM and NOT A CLUB.
No, Kim, all he was trying to get across was about choice, and that the 22mph test was a waste of time. He didnt, as far as I can see say that wearing a helmet was a waste of time only the test for the helmet.
This is a forum - and imho it seems to be fairly bitchy/cliquey. People come and go and the style of the forum will change with them. Such is life
True.
Shame he felt he had to leave over one thread . Fair enough he did have a point about freedom of choice and some didn't quite get that,but he slung as much mud as was slung at him! Cross words happen here but usually everyone makes up in the end, well apart from old Fester
True
oh im so sorry......blah
was not aware that you wished to censor the forum....
nanny state or nanny f ing forum???????????????
Nothing has been sensored on either of the threads and never will be. (unless we are asked to by a majority)
This thread may go on for ever, but I just wish it would all go away, but I know it wont for some reason, people will always want to have the 10 pence worth even if its drivval.
All I am asking is for people to sometimes think before they post, thats all.